>>12299750>And I said "basically because this is our instinct" in other wordsNo, you didn't. You said the animal kingdom will throw out the weakest links.
Tell me how improved social skills and improved immune systems (at the least) translate to weaknesses.
>Should we keep the weak alive?It's conditioning. Some of it takes significantly longer. We shouldn't be enabling the lowest forms of existence with no intent on growth or development.
The direction of growth is subjective, but if a person is well developed, it really doesn't matter what path they take as it will have a gravitas and power about it.
Enabling uselessness and "I can't" mentality is not something we should tolerate.
>Should we celebrate diversity?In a sense, yes. The forced diversity we find in media and in propaganda? No. Even the internet has strict insular hubs along with some loose ones. What matters is state of mind. There's white nigger rednecks who have nothing to do with blacks, but still trash things up smoking meth and whatnot.
Groups need space and reasonable resource to grow their own ambition, with an emphasis on (group)self-sufficiency.
I genuinely respect diversity and the fruits that different compounded states of mind and perceptions brings us, with the caveat that they are expansive and developmental, even if I may disagree in the direction.
Nature expects diversity, like it or not. This is part of what arises competition and growth in many directions. This continual struggle along with shift in perspectives is part of what agitates growth.
Totalitarians will never 100% succeed at their mission, but what they will do is take big chunks out and put some of their stamp on the human tapestry. The absolutist perspective affords them a confidence in action to carry out these process, but its totality is illusion. In life there is only advantage, there is no winning. There is only a wheel to be at the helm of or not, but the wheel will keep rotating with or without you.
