>>12296501hindu numerals are based on the angles they were originally drawn with.
thus they had count.
thus you're saying that the count of 1+1+1+1=1+1+1+1+1
or ((1++)++)++ = (((1++)++)++)++
which implied 1 = 1++
are they to imply the magnitude of a single unit is equal to the twice that magnitude?
grab a ruler then two more
put two together to form 60cms of length
then put it next to the other.
Why do post modernist hate hindu arabic numerals and geometry so much?
