I dont get why p=np is such a difficult problem. Its clear that it doesn't. For all iterations of a function as a set, it is necessary that the computation be preserved while also not modifying the function in any way. The only way to bypass this is to say that a function demands the output set be composed within and independent for outputs prior to the composed functions output, and to be recursive following the first step. In this case p=np via that p and np exist simultaneously as the inverse of one another. Duh.