>>12291965Basically lesbians need lezzyland
Indigenous need ooowoowooland
Gays need buttsexland
Blacks need wakanda
So on
I would say state would function suuuuper hands off, and relative to the needs of each group. Sort of like a steward to facilitate their needs.
States objectives would be relative to the needs of the groups. The more a number of groups aligned on a value, the more energy could be put into developing and dispersing it.
I would say that all state-objectives would just be like bounties for groups and capitalists to compete after, and resource being dispersed based on accomplishing that bounty. Once its been accomplished, a new one is put up to address.
The infinite singular direction we have now is silly and just aches for collapse. Objectives should always be seen as temporary and with a point, even if the point is that the groups want to expand development in a specific field non-objectively
If a group gets too large, either they are dismantled, voluntarily decide to go a new way and disperse (join other groups values and perspectives), develop in new ways, or they basically just battle it out with the other groups lol
If you keep rotating the values, you can pretty much always assure that no singular group will get out of hand, since they simply won't have the specialization necessary to beat the specs of the other groups
So state, or whoevers dishing out resource, can just change the stage on what the major cultural values are. This way, many aspects of different groups can be grown, just being brought more forward at different times
All an economy really is, is that which will agitate our energy. Humans are the resource. Money=labor=energy+skill. Anything very well developed will help agitate, expand, and illuminate us to invest ourselves into partaking in culture
With these different groups, have high mobility. But when you enter a place, you adhere to their rules, state of mind, perspective, etc
Requires the option for high mobility
