>>12291261the way I see it, defining inf=1/0 necessitates it is a) convergent, and b) -inf=+inf.
The only time I have seen this work in practice is the Riemann sphere, which is complex.
>nothing added infinitely many timesthis is incompatible with inf=1/0, since "infinitely many times" is both negative ans positive, which is nonsense.
If you want to think of infinity as "really, really big," and strictly (+) or (-), it has to be divergent, i.e., inf=/=(1/0)
IOW, before you try to use intuition or definitions/axioms with infinity, you need to distinguish between whether you're using the divergent or convergent definitions
