>>12286441>You can easily construct a set of laws which work in reverseNo you can not construct such a set of laws that still refer to actual observed phenomena.
>I do not come into A contradiction with an entity being able to perceive the universe rolling backwards.Irrelevant.
>general relativity already gives contradictions into the notion that information is required to construct the notion of the “present“ (since information is relative in time).Time never goes backwards in GR, it either moves forward or doesn't move, but it never moves backward. Nothing can move faster than light which is what would be required for time to move backwards in GR
>Hence since your perception of how the universe is can only be constructed by the information you are accessible to - and is not the true state of the universe at hand - you cannot use the perception of time through entropy as definitive proof of the non symmetry of time.Here's the thing, YOU saying that YOUR perception is somehow correct (despite the fact that it is not and all known physics is not on your side) and then somehow talking down to me as though I am the one that lacks understanding or imagination of the situation (which is not what is happening; what is actually happening is that you don't know what you're talking about) is a sign that you posses a combination of ignorance and arrogance that is unreasonable.
You literally asked "prove it without relying on the perspective of a biological observer" despite the fact that you yourself are a biological observer and no human can do such a thing, ever. It makes no sense at all to even demand such a thing, and shows that you have an inflated sense of self ability. It's also irrelevant, by the way.
