>>12287940>They were bothered for not wearing a mask which in turn lead to their arrest.In one case, they had a voting option where they didn't need to wear a mask, and they chose to go where they weren't supposed to, trespassed, then argued with the police for 30 minutes when they refused to leave before finally being arrested. Don't act like they weren't attempting to stir the pot.
>That was an instance of people going viral for not wearing masks. Try to keep up, please.That was an instance of people going out of their way to create a stir by not wearing a mask, announced it, and filmed it, when you were acting like it was just some innocent shopper trying to run their errands making the news. You've yet to prove your original point.
>Wrong. They were approached for not wearing a mask when there would have been zero problems if they were left alone.Oh, got it, so if I ask you to not board the plane naked, I deserve to get punched because I should have left you alone? Are you kidding me? It was an over the top reaction, and that's why it was a story. Do you really think it'd make the news if he'd simply put a mask on or left the plane without a fight? Every single one of your stories involved extra shit besides the simple fact that they had no mask on.
>Okay then, why do we have to social distance if wearing a mask is all that is required to curb the spread?Why do you think being outdoors is the same as being indoors?
>Being 6ft apart at bars and restaurants spiked cases, but standing closer than sardines and shouting for days at a time in groups of 300 did not produce the same effects? That is unbelievable.It's really not, not if you have any sense. People at restaurants may be six feet apart, their servers are not, their food is exposed to the air, their mouths and noses aren't covered, ventilation is probably poor. Same thing at bars, with the extra issue that drunk people are not going to socially distance. The numbers bear it out.
