>>12284210Cont
The whole career thing isn't going to die but it's largely going to go downhill.
The need for specialization is mostly for the construction process of things, and we really don't even need that many people to be specialized very narrowly.
It should be like a handful of authorities, then just below them at people that know quite a bit, but have a bit broader range of studies, under then more broad still etc.
The mass of people, generally, ought to be able to access many different avenues to apply to their personal lives.
When it comes to online, it's basically going to have to be like a fuck ton of YouTube channels where people can basically translate and express the hard data in ways that naturally attune to the students, as opposed to going the route of residential schools in Canada and trying to force condition people a certain way.
This might be a stretch given the times, but even how we study the behavior of our universe could be a bit more intuitive and experiential than the autistic and convoluted thing it's become.
The more convoluted it is, the further it is from genuine true nature, whether that's a problem with language or the identity of those whom express the findings.
Even how I expressed all of this. This is cultural symptoms
I keep seeing elites talk about efficiency efficiency efficiency in the coming eras. We talk about this so machine like.
In the past, they were able to express very complex ideas through simple lines and poetry.
Unironically, we need to be pumping up the poetry world and merging it with our expression of concepts.
Less rigid language structure makes it easier to translate, express, share, and helps keep an open mind.
As well, it "efficiently" expresses concepts and ideas the way our usage of language does not.