>>12282430>someone in such high positions you will always get treated better than a commoner.Better to what capacity? People awe over bezos and musk because they are tech giants, but aside from those guys, the comfort afforded to these people is largely bought as luxury. Most people do not actively care about most rich people. Regardless, the idea of
>the commoner This reeks of insecurity. Wealth means a good amount in society, but it does not really make you an uncommon man. Possessing such wealth is uncommon, but I don’t think most people, myself included, really see that as the reason people are uncommon.
>In that sense I mean lower on the social hierarchy.Which one are we talking about? Something specific, or something your insecurity constructs? There are monetary power structures out there, but they don’t necessarily coincide with a social dynamic that sees people *favorable* towards the rich. If anything, it’s constrained reaction, not genuine acceptance
>And these aren't tough positions to reach for someone as smart as, say, a mathematicianWhat does this mean? If you’re talking about understanding what you’re talking about, you have to be less nebulous and more precise
