>>12280621Climate change is physically unavoidable. It's not even climate change that's the problem, it's the entropy resulting from the technological growth. Even if you solved the CO2 issue you'd still have passive heating up that will only get worse as we advance further. Because this planet cannot dissipate heat from so many people at such technological levels.
When people put forward the issue of heating up, yes they are correct. But what they conveniently do not put forward is the fact that we must either
>1) exterminate people Guidestones-style>2) revert to pure anarcho-primitivism with a theocratic government that forbids technologyWhat they propose, carbon taxes and then negative emission plants and low EROI green energy and so on, all of that is literally useless. It generates a tiny local dip but the graph will be up to where it was just a few years later if the population and technological growth rates are maintained. So they must be suppressed on top of enforcing a carbon-prevention dystopia, which is essentially the above two points.
The issue of heating up is, firstly, a malthusian one, and secondly, an issue of our inability to colonize planets that are further away from the Sun and therefor have a higher heating up budget. Non-expansionist technology grew too fast while expansionist technology such as habitability improvements, space travel and GMO all stagnated at a very poor level, not at all the level we should've been on right now. We should have at least a tiny percent of our manufacturing on the moon and at least a test colony on Mars by now, but we barely even have the foundations for either. Our issue of unavoidable entropy has nothing to do with CO2. The process of heating up cannot be prevented locally on the planet when the population variable is unbounded, solving CO2 will only delay it for one generation. But it can be spread across several of them instead which is the more logical solution we should be striving towards.
