>>12280437I think your stupidity is more basic than I thought. Science doesn't answer "why" question in the way you're using the word. It's a descriptive project.
Also literally any explanation is going to bottom out at some point. If we ever reach a deeper explanation of gravity say the way that we can explain temperature as kinetic energy of small particles, we will still in turn have to explain that explanation or just say "well that's the way it is".
You seriously need to reconsider what you can expect out of a scientific explanation in the first place, because all the issues you're having apply to most things, not just gravity.
Like at base observation what we call gravity is just a grouping of certain movements of objects(and note that those weren't even grouped the way we think of them today until newton).
