Evolution or the Big Bang Theory is NOT scientific
No.12277348 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>12277365 >>12277396 >>12277420 >>12277434 >>12277614 >>12277666
The Big Bang Theory
There is literally nothing scientific about the whole universe coming from nothing or from a giant "explosion" (which came from nothing).
That breaks literally every fundamental law of science.
It cannot be tested.
It cannot be recreated.
This falls under the real of philosphy and religion.
Evolution likewise
>A fish over a quadrillion years turned into a person with a soul and a spirit.
Again, unscientific.
Cannot be tested
Cannot be observed
>But dog breeding, fly breeding, etc prove Evolution
No my guy. One type of dog turning into another type of dog is not """Evolution""". It's still a dog.
Think about it.
There is literally nothing scientific about the whole universe coming from nothing or from a giant "explosion" (which came from nothing).
That breaks literally every fundamental law of science.
It cannot be tested.
It cannot be recreated.
This falls under the real of philosphy and religion.
Evolution likewise
>A fish over a quadrillion years turned into a person with a soul and a spirit.
Again, unscientific.
Cannot be tested
Cannot be observed
>But dog breeding, fly breeding, etc prove Evolution
No my guy. One type of dog turning into another type of dog is not """Evolution""". It's still a dog.
Think about it.
