>>12271077>it's holofractal universe, it's whatever the fuck. It's not real. "Yes"
>We're still missing a ton about the fundamentals of physics, the universe, and reality, but this definitely is not even close to the answer."We don't know shit from shinola but we know what we're talking about". Physics must be a degree where you master dualistically contradicting yourself.
>>12271085>WOW. GR doesn't predict magnetic fields. Who could have known that?Yet somehow it knows how light works and that it "bends".
>b-but what an electromagnetic phenomena have to do with magnetic fields, amirite? >Except they don't actually have a model for cosmology. >They have some ideas.That's what a "model" is you fucking retard.
>They claim they don't need new variables but only because they have never actually tried to quantitatively explain the data.There is no proof of quantity to begin with.
>EUists can't even explain cosmological redshift without adding new stuff, they do not have a cosmology.The phenomena was known as "electromagnetic retardation", until some guy whose name literally means "retarded " came and described it differently with no proof or proper explanation.
>They want to return to the dark ages where people just made shit up.Return? We're already living in the age where physishits make shit up anyway such as:
Particles
Dark matter
"waves"(of what we'll never know)
The belief that a description of mass accelerating is a "Force" (gravity)
To name a few
