What's the ultimate and final scientific consensus on the imaginary triangle?
>Last episode's summary: complex numbers not ordered
But we can do better than that though. For an example are there any positives instead of just fishing for negatives? How would this apply to something, or rather not just the triangle but using complex numbers as lengths in general? People automatically dismiss the usage of complex lengths because of the ordering problem and the absolute value mantra, but has anyone even attempted to challenge the dogma?