>>12277121>since fucking when is simply saying that a situation is being mishandled by the government a "conspiracy theory"?Never said that.
>he just listed the quantifiable negative consequences of the government choosing to handle this situation the way it hasNo, he either made those points up or reposted conspiracy coronahoax anti-mask garbage.
>>12277397>well shit, I must be imagining this post then:That's not me. That guy is only saying it's airborne and contagious, nothing about "shutting down the entire world" you idiot. Stop making shit up just so you can act triggered. And before the hurrr durrr how do I know it's not you?, I specifically quoted the implication you made and alles about that.
>Your support for the lockdowns was implied by your view of the virus' severity.Sure, of course. I'm everything implied that's negative for you so you can attack it, not what I actually wrote.
>All of this should be common sense and straight forwardYeah, like how the actual problem isn't the death rate to you too. Yet here you are, using it as an argument when it doesn't even matter at all.
>george Floyd riotsCaused by the corone measures, right. Whew.
