>>12263309It's not steady-state, it's just eternal cosmos. Evolving from emptyness in the infinite "period" of time.
It is better, because any other assumption will have to answer "where did THAT (god, singularity, whatever) came from?"
You don't know if bbt has more or less evidence, you only believe it because you was taught it. You probably never heard of the contradictions of that theory.
Now they prepare grounds for astronomic observations inevitably finding objects beyond the boundaries of theirs by hyping the "it expands faster than c" bs.
