/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12261661

269KiB, 1600x1200, theory of the universe.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 22:17:42 2020 No.12261661 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12261809 >>12261812 >>12261898 >>12261905 >>12261967

brainlet here, pic related hypothetical about the makeup of the universe came to me last night in a dream. basically, the big bang was two unique universe "clusters", with their own fundamental rules and laws, colliding into each other and fusing/overlaying, with the interactions leading to novel particles such as physical matter. am I on to anything, or am I just a quack?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 22:20:17 No.12261673 Report

Quoted By:

That high.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 22:45:11 No.12261764 Report

Quoted By:

You're homosexual. Never post here again.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 22:58:23 No.12261809 Report

Quoted By: >>12261854 >>12261860

>>12261661
How would this even be tested? Which "concepts" are the atomic concepts that "collide" at the boundaries? Is there a distinct "cluster" for every possible real or rational number value for the fine structure constant? For weak mixing angles? Fermions? Bosons? Other quantum numbers? Why these and not other clusters? What predictions are made by this model? Does it even have any predictions? Couldn't you just take any observed property of the universe and surmise that there must have been a "concept cluster" that collided with all of the other constituent "concept clusters", making this model unfalsifiable? Can clusters become disentangled, so that the Higgs field can suddenly leave our universe and everything is now without mass? Is each point of intersection supposed to be an entire universe?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 22:59:09 No.12261812 Report

Quoted By: >>12261859

>>12261661
There is no possibility of universes colliding with each other.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:12:28 No.12261854 Report

Quoted By:

>>12261809
there would be two fundamental particles with unique aspects, incapable of interacting with each other, and a third fundamental particle that can interact with both.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:13:30 No.12261859 Report

Quoted By: >>12261900

>>12261812
can you source this claim?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:13:39 No.12261860 Report

Quoted By: >>12261862 >>12261883

>>12261809
OP here.

For most of your quesitons:
I'm still writing about it, will soon submit it to viXra.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:14:43 No.12261862 Report

Quoted By: >>12261883

>>12261860
OP here, I'm not OP, I am.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:20:12 No.12261883 Report

Quoted By: >>12261887

>>12261860
>>12261862

OP's dual universe hypothesis right here.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ohshit.png, 5KiB, 371x127

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:21:15 No.12261887 Report

Quoted By:

>>12261883

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:26:28 No.12261898 Report

Quoted By:

>>12261661
It's pretty vague, op.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1583728272664.jpg, 60KiB, 1080x606

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:27:14 No.12261900 Report

Quoted By:

>>12261859

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:28:03 No.12261905 Report

Quoted By: >>12261908

>>12261661
Great so the universe is two universes, what’s the two universes made from?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:29:10 No.12261908 Report

Quoted By: >>12261913

>>12261905
Two universes each, then four universes. It's pretty simple, actually. What are you're not understading?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:32:00 No.12261913 Report

Quoted By: >>12262008

>>12261908
It doesn't do much in the way of explaining anything.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:35:25 No.12261921 Report

Quoted By:

It's a recursive definition.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Untitled.png, 22KiB, 856x356

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:44:19 No.12261967 Report

Quoted By:

>>12261661

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:50:02 No.12262001 Report

Quoted By:

this was already considered in string theory
how nobody else here knew that, i don't understand

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 22 Oct 2020 23:51:03 No.12262008 Report

Quoted By: >>12262136 >>12263372

>>12261913
it explains the big bang

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 23 Oct 2020 00:15:42 No.12262136 Report

Quoted By:

>>12262008
it explains the big bang as much as saying god clapping his buttcheeks together created the big bang. You said an unknown thing makes two blobs mush together. Where are they floating around in? Now you have to invent an explanation of where all the blobs are contained. your creating complexity but not necessarily getting anywhere because there's no rationale for or against all of that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 23 Oct 2020 08:21:26 No.12263372 Report

Quoted By:

>>12262008
Sure, that should be pretty easy.
>priest wanted to have a theory compatible with creation ex nihilo
>saw redshift and asserted it to be entirely linear
>"oh look, eventually it all goes into a single point, it MUST have come out of nothing"
>atheists deny the theory for coming from a priest but then adopt it as their own upon having it peddled to them as being a way to totally own the theists epic style

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches