>>12255147"return to child" is commented on in the bible
the tantrics also viewed women and children as the "true enlightened", but i could never have a genuine discussion about that on 4chan.
it's not "nihilistic". are children "nihilistic" to you? fuckers can make energy out of playing with bubbles for hours. can you do that?
neitzsche was at the doorstep of a lot of esoteric indian wisdom, but one of the biggest things that held him back, imo, is that he ascertained his knowledge in spite of an empirical structure, and not absent of it, playfully exploring potent methods that, for example, certain indian cultures came across through pure experimentation and vigor.
i'm not talking about "asteroids" in terms of a non static system.
(relative to our perception) some properties that hold are more "stable" than others. we take these as empirical. this is just the behavior they currently occupy.
there's a reason they say shit like "ignorance is bliss"
the state of "bliss" for humans, or nirvana, is an absence. a dissolve. liberation.
from there, you can intuitively enquire about a subject, thing, force, whatever you wish, and incline towards expressing it and working with it in new ways. new languages, new abilities to perceive and utilize.
I am not saying things like a certain "force" doesn't exist, for example. just that the language around it, how its expressed, all of our cultural and personal conditioning, the conditioning within the "science" itself, our states of mind, on and on and on, get baked into our perception of such a thing.
the more we are "taught", the more our field of vision -can- narrow.
this is the virtues of "childs play". they just fuck around with things. they let their curiosity and intuition guide them. you must notice that our sciences go great lengths to try to conform some shit into a model that just become absurd.
