>>12243153>That complexity as a category Define the category of complexity
>as a way to limit semantic satiation in mathematicscut the purple prose and express what you want, or else I'll file this is with more schizo ramblings, to which you'll reply something along the lines of "ugh, brainlets on this board, admonishing what they don't understand"
>boundary for complex as a slice of analysis>complex or compound thread until at least 3 unique posters are involved that are not OP. So far this thread only has 1 so appears simple to many and all simple observations can be concluded safely without punishment because, again, simple interaction.This is all purple prose for you to express, "the conversation doesn't get layered and varied enough until 3 people join." It's a vague idea at best.
