>>12244880>it probably was asymptomaticWhat he said sounded very different.
>"had to" or "wanted to"?Had to, because of mandatory case separation.
>media and politics fabricating panicCan you post an example of a widespread news article or politician rhetoric?
>wearing masks when driving alone in a car, those people fear covid-19, and they fear it because they are brainwashed by massive propaganda.No, these people regularly have passengers and want to keep their car's interior clean. Informed decision, seeing how asymptomatic spreaders exist. This is mandated by my workplace for example. You're assuming they're afraid, but the vast majority is not. Informing yourself about the pandemic and acting responsibly isn't panic.
>horror storiesWhat are you implying with this?
> I do not believe that those cases are really more common than with any other fluOkay, even then, the insane infectivity results in more cases and reinfections will result in a much worse outcome compared to other viral diseases.
>None of them was a severe caseWhy were they in the hospital?
>Did I?Yes. Directly in the section I quoted. Guess you fogot that as quickly as you forgot what my actual point was.
>Step by step we saw that the "flufag"-opinion was right.You mean you want this to be right? Because it sure doesn't look like that.
>we do not have reliable dataWell, we do. Just not large-scale data. Chinese studies were available as early as February, western studies followed in July and later. All published in respectable journals, like nature (Long et al for example).
>"health care systems going to collapse"Are you implying that wasn't a realistic scenario at the time? Again, many hospitals WERE overblown. Google it and see for yourself. Sure, many weren't, but it did happen.
>"it now hits the young"It does. Always did. Google for strokes if you want to know more.
>that would mean, that their dictatorial behaviour cannot be justified in retrospectAgree. But not in this case.
