>>12235380>change instead of total outputhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2018/07/01/china-emits-more-carbon-dioxide-than-the-u-s-and-eu-combined/#5312849c628c>Since 1965, no country has put more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than the United States. The 264 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide the U.S. has emitted to the atmosphere represented 22.5% fo global emissions during that time, and was well ahead of the cumulative 216 billion metric tons from the European Union (EU).So there's one problem with your post. The second is
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/chart-of-the-day-these-countries-have-the-largest-carbon-footprints/Where the US contributes 14.95 tons per capita. Just ahead of Canada's 14.91 and well ahead of countries like China which contributes 6.57 tons per person anually.
The third problem with your post.
https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/each-countrys-share-co2-emissionsWhere the US contributes annually 15% of total carbon emissions, just behind China's 28 percent and well ahead of India with 3x more people at 7%. China is only ahead of the US because of the size of their population.
The fourth problem with your post.
https://time.com/5714267/china-green-energy/While the US is propping up the fossil fuel energy sector China is not only building green energy infrastructure in its home country, it is bankrolling green energy projects around the world. It is well past the US in green energy research and is coming to dominate the future of green energy.
The 5th problem with your post
https://futureoflife.org/2016/08/05/developing-countries-cant-afford-climate-change/Developing countries need to use fossil fuels to build their infrastructures because they currently can't afford green energy solutions. So unless you personally wish to pass laws to bankroll those countries toward green energy they need fossil fuels to survive. The US and Europe got where they are by burning fossil fuels.
