>>12238676Wrong. His larger surface area makes him easier to kill. Real fighting isn't hand to hand combat in a cage. Its "I stab you or shoot you faster than you do to me" wherein the smaller man always has the advantage.
Even in hunter gatherer societies, small men are superior
>Finally, research on another forager population found that height is negatively correlated with hunting returns (Lee 1979), suggesting that tall height may not be an indicator of productivity in such economies.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2781963/This also completely coincides with the fact that males have been shrinking throughout all of human history and the difference in size between men and women is less than ever before in our evolutionary history. In a spear fight, which is how fights happen in hunter gatherer societies, small men win more often against large men.
Larger men also die younger, have more health problems, require more resources. The actual scientific reality of the situation is that small men are superior.
I find it funny that everyone always seems to just say large guys are superior and are fine with it, but when someone points out that the opposite is actually true, they freak out.
