>>12234583>Inspecting any and every happy person reveals privilege relative to othersThis is not what Viktor Frankl shows in his book "man's search for meaning"
>and low capacity for critical thought Yet, the inventor of formal logic, aristotle, was a very happy man, euler, the greatest mathematician to ever live, was also happy
>resulting in numerous objectively false beliefs about the worldIf by your definition, every belief that leads to happiness is false, no matter how much evidence there is to it, then, its no surprise you will be stuck in a bubble of unhappiness
It is so easy to refute your superfluous thinking, as a matter of fact, you jus need to realize your perception, your mentality in other words, about things that happen to you, isnt fixed in stone, and is only dependent on you. Say you hear nigger music playing loud so you get angry about it, but then you think theres no logical reason to be angry about it, so you hear the music again and feel nothing, this was a change of mentality
Anothe example would be two guys, one fails miserably in a date, and then escapes to videogames and porn (because he is one of the 95% of people that dont think); the other one fails miserably as well, but he takes his failure as an opportunity to improve and try again, as he thinks, and because he thinks, he could realize children dont speak English perfectly, they fail, they fall, but keep trying and getting better, they dont attach emotions to the act of failure that will inhibit their growth, they choose not to
I already gave enough pearls to swine here, read these and do it if you're worth a penny
>>12234575>>12234581>>12234588>>12234593Earl even had the charity of recording somethig about happiness directly
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg2w2lHRiFQ