>>12231839>There is no logical reason for there to be a fundamental anything. This disturbs me a great deal as well.
Nothing should be existing, there's no reason for some axioms to be true and not others.
Maybe nothing actually exists.
But then one thing exists (nothing), and so the concept of unity exists as well!
Just like in set theory, where the concept of one is built from nothing, enclosed in parenthesis to signify its existence.
And then every number is built from the previous ones (cf. Neumann ordinals).
And by enclosing numbers into sets, you can actually define fields, and with fields you can define reality.
In propositional logic, false statements imply true and false statements equivalently. The existence of nothingness is a paradox, so it can imply every propositions, every axioms, including those on which our reality is based on.
I think we're just the consequence of a paradox, and that nothing and everything exist at the same time.
