/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12225275

358KiB, 697x1222, eat shit stupid.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

The day finally came, science tells eating shit is good

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 04:44:51 2020 No.12225275 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12225349 >>12225371 >>12225437 >>12225548 >>12226044 >>12227735 >>12231304

Just if youre a baby though, for now...
I fucking knew it this day would come, the day i saw people worshipping science i knew if "scientists" told people that eating shit was good they would do it
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/10/eating-tiny-bit-mom-s-poop-could-give-c-section-babies-immune-primer

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 05:10:32 No.12225349 Report

Quoted By: >>12226390

>>12225275
come on, everybody knows giving birth always involves the mom shitting herself all over the delivery room. true fact. so this is just making a c-section a little more “natural”

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 05:17:41 No.12225371 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225275
I thought koalas did the same

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 05:30:00 No.12225401 Report

Quoted By: >>12225413 >>12225428

>could

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 05:34:11 No.12225413 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225401
Yes that is indeed how science works

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 05:42:29 No.12225428 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225401
>could
Yet theyre feeding dozens of babies with their mothers shit, and probably the mothers aret wven aware of this shit, they just sign hospital paperwork without reading it

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 05:47:05 No.12225437 Report

Quoted By: >>12226379 >>12226391 >>12230293

>>12225275
You know what else they would benefit from? Not being induced with pitocin, clamped, injected with vitamin K, silver nitrate and vaseline put in the eyes, circumcised, vaccinated, deprived of breast milk.and given only fluoridated chlorinated water to drink.

New research suggests. Studies say. Scientists now believe.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 06:34:13 No.12225535 Report

Quoted By: >>12226379

Not not give the baby a fecal transplant?

We already have fecal transplant should people not want to eat a fecal pill.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 06:38:01 No.12225548 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225275
That's been known for at least years.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1595709053468.jpg, 35KiB, 679x655

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 08:00:43 No.12225759 Report

Quoted By:

Momy poopies

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO g.gif, 197KiB, 380x400

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 09:30:23 No.12225991 Report

Quoted By:

I fucking love science

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 09:55:37 No.12226044 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225275
The baby is meant to fall in the huge, nasty shit the mother takes during birth so her microbiome gets transferred. We have known this since pretty much immediately after we learned about the microbiome.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 10:16:56 No.12226086 Report

Quoted By:

Hitler are poop pills too

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 13:07:29 No.12226379 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225437
this

>>12225535
you want to cut up open a baby you idiot?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1566664493884.png, 922KiB, 827x815

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 13:11:38 No.12226383 Report

Quoted By: >>12226392

>could
someone should just beat those fucking journalists

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 13:17:10 No.12226390 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225349
no

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 537C2068-6F28-4C78-BC33-A870246A (...).png, 10KiB, 570x520

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 13:18:12 No.12226391 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225437
Who could he responsible for all of that? Hmmm

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 13:18:37 No.12226392 Report

Quoted By:

>>12226383
could may might
could may might
could may might

New studies suggest getting shot in the head could may might spell bad things for you down the road.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 20:39:49 No.12227735 Report

Quoted By: >>12227751 >>12227763 >>12227775

>>12225275
fecal transplants have been used in medicine for years you dumb nigger and yes fecal transplant is just a fancy word for getting foreign shit into your GI.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 20:49:52 No.12227751 Report

Quoted By:

>>12227735
>fecal transplants have been used in medicine for years you dumb nigger
Through your mouth motherfucker?
FUcking idiot, theyre suggesting the babies to DRINK the SHIT with breast milk, its not a feces transplant where they put it inside your instetine

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 20:54:08 No.12227763 Report

Quoted By: >>12228017

>>12227735
>fecal transplants
True, but you don't smear the shit on the person's face. And the study obviously thought there might actually be a downside:

>Three weeks before the women were to give birth, their fecal samples were scanned for pathogens including group B Streptococcus and herpesvirus.

>Seven women had pathogen-free samples. After they gave birth, the researchers mixed 3.5 or 7 milligrams of their diluted fecal matter into 5 milliliters of breast milk—donated from a breast milk bank and pumped from the mothers themselves—and then fed it to their babies.

Shouldn't pathogens be natural? Why filter them out?

Also, the microbiome quickly changes, whether exposed to shit or not. The article concluded it's different early on, but they didn't form any conclusion that the difference is actually meaningful.

Here's another take:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2216818-c-section-babies-have-a-different-microbiome-but-not-for-long/

>The team found that about 80 per cent of C-section-born babies had hospital-acquired bacteria in their guts when they were born, compared with 50 per cent of vaginally born babies. And the bacteria made up around 30 per cent of the total bacteria in C-section babies, compared with just 10 per cent in babies born vaginally.

>But by the time the babies were weaned at the age of around 6 to 9 months, these differences had largely disappeared. And all the babies were healthy, so the researchers can’t tell if there are any implications for health. “We don’t know the long-term consequences of these findings,” says Field.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 20:57:19 No.12227775 Report

Quoted By:

>>12227735
Oh yeah they make you eat the shit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 21:53:23 No.12228017 Report

Quoted By: >>12228311 >>12230377

>>12227763
I wonder why they didnt just add some probiotics in the mothers milk instead of pure shit
Maybe the conspiracy theorists are right and the purpose of this is to make babies impure

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 23:32:47 No.12228311 Report

Quoted By:

>>12228017
Breast milk already contains both prebiotics and probiotics, along with antimicrobial properties, which is likely why the babies had similar gut floras by the time they were 6 to 9 months old. The breast milk diet will eventually crowd out the bacteria they were initially exposed to.

So the question is whether or not an immediate dose of bacteria (from crap) is beneficial or not. The second article I posted showed that babies born via c-section had a high proportion of hospital-acquired bacteria. That could potentially be problematic with things like MRSA out there, but the mother's feces could also contain viruses and pathogens. I'd have to read about it more, but I don't agree with the first article's premise that because we've always been exposed to crap during childbirth, that it must be beneficial. A difference in bacterial flora very early on is not proof of a benefit. If babies born vaginally are healthier during their first six months compared to c-section babies, then that's something to work from, but there's still bound to be other factors involved causing the c-section to be needed in the first place that could also affect the baby's health.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 14 Oct 2020 12:05:44 No.12230293 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225437
What's wrong with vitamin K? Or is the application of it wrong?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 14 Oct 2020 12:33:45 No.12230377 Report

Quoted By:

>>12228017
I'd say it's not simply about making things impure, but specially about mockery. Things that are sacred and pure should be desecrated, made impure, corrupted, destroyed, considered to be a bad thing and, specially, mocked. The target would not only be the baby, in such case, but the own (sacred) act of breastfeeding and (sacred) relationship between a mother and her kid.

Completely off-topic comment, though; targeting only your post. I don't mean it's really what's happening in this case (but it 'could', specially via supernatural means, aka demonic influence over people's "good will"; but these would be only conjectures, even by a religious point of view).

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 14 Oct 2020 17:42:53 No.12231304 Report

Quoted By:

>>12225275
They aren't wrong, C-section births can lead to an overly sterile birth environment for children which leads to a less developed immune system.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 14 Oct 2020 20:55:47 No.12232016 Report

Quoted By:

now this is the type of thread that makes me visit this board so often

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches