/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12221830

15KiB, 640x360, ezgif.com-resize-62.gif

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 06:43:14 2020 No.12221830 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12221869 >>12221870 >>12221888 >>12221963 >>12224592

How long will I have to study to solve this million-dollar prize?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 07:00:17 No.12221855 Report

Quoted By:

6 mins

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 07:06:47 No.12221869 Report

Quoted By:

>>12221830
Depending on your teacher 4 min to 6 years.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 07:06:51 No.12221870 Report

Quoted By:

>>12221830
8-20 years

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 07:11:29 No.12221882 Report

Quoted By:

if you are setting out to solve the problem to win 1M$, then you aren't gonna make it. the prize money is incidental

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 07:17:12 No.12221888 Report

Quoted By: >>12221901

>>12221830
Help me explain why supercomputers can't search for uniqueness and completeness to this equation for all time?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 07:27:07 No.12221901 Report

Quoted By: >>12221919 >>12221938

>>12221888
Numerical methods just can't do that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 07:28:08 No.12221903 Report

Quoted By:

You know what pisses me off the most. That the prize doesn't scale with inflation.

Even if I did work on solving any of them, by the time I'm done it would be worth like $100. Whoopdidoo

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 07:40:36 No.12221919 Report

Quoted By: >>12222211

>>12221901
what are the current numerical methods to solving Navier stokes? I'm currently learning about the runge-Kutta method for numerical solutions to ODEs

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 07:55:04 No.12221938 Report

Quoted By:

>>12221901
how many years until I can understand tao's paper on Navier stokes :( https://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.0290.pdf

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 08:07:29 No.12221963 Report

Quoted By: >>12222944 >>12224598

>>12221830
Wait so it's just F = ma? Why the fuck has no one solved this yet

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 10:12:26 No.12222211 Report

Quoted By:

>>12221919
most of the time (because simplifications can be made) finite element methods are used , but this does not account for all cases

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 12 Oct 2020 16:16:44 No.12222944 Report

Quoted By:

>>12221963
Basically in 3 dimensions which this thing is expressed in it gets quite fucked up. If you know what these operators do try to write it out and you will see, the vector form makes it seem easy...

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 00:22:36 No.12224592 Report

Quoted By:

>>12221830
You're missing orthogonal tangent vector condition.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 00:25:16 No.12224598 Report

Quoted By: >>12224602

>>12221963
The problem is one about uniqueness and stability. There are hundred year old books containing solutions. This equation is like not exactly integrible. So the problem is for existence and uniqueness of solutions for something like t > 0 given a set of Cauchy conditions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 13 Oct 2020 00:26:18 No.12224602 Report

Quoted By:

>>12224598
>This equation is like not exactly integrible
like should be likely

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches