>>12219864>phimosis bad like covid, so circumcise preventativelyYou can't compare phimosis, which affects only the "infected individual," to a transmissible disease. Also, you could easily fix the problem by circumcising only the men with phimosis, fixing the detriment to their quality of life. You don't even have to be circumcised to fix it, there's a simpler, safer surgery that splits the foreskin, maintaining sensitivity, and manual stretching actually corrects the problem in most cases because it causes the skin to expand, like the big hole-in-the-ear earrings people get.
>circumcision causes no decrease in sensitivityare you crazy? It removes most penile nerve endings.
https://intaction.org/does-circumcision-cause-erectile-dysfunction/Also, it causes the glans penis to keratinize, which is similar to the formation of a callous. I'm not citing a source because you can check your pants or google it for this one.
>foreskin is vestigialNo it's not. At the least, it keeps the glans, a mucous membrane, moist like the inside of your cheek. Even if it were, that's no justification for removing a sexually sensitive area of the body. Why not, by the exact same logic, remove the labia of infant females? Who knows, it might cause your pointless couple digit reduction in STD transmission (which could be less sensitive males having less sex as a result of their mutilated genetalia).
