>>12217041>are we living in a simulationno
>but most observers would be simulated >so shouldn't a typical observer expect >to be simulated, a priori?no
the number of observers and their status as
simulated/unsimulated doesn't matter
what matters is the number of OBSERVATIONS
not all observers are weighted equally when rolling the dice
consider this hypothetical:
there is a finite number of mortals, and one immortal
you wake up with no knowledge of which one you are
a priori, as soon as you make the first observation
you should then expect to be the immortal
since almost all observations belong to him.
same thing in regards to simulation:
even if more observers are simulated,
most observations would be UNSIMULATED
so given that you perform an observation
without knowing whether you're simulated/unsimulated
you should expect to be unsimulated, a priori
