>>12215377>>12215366It's interesting that you happily defer to engineers/scientists when it comes to cars, aeroplanes, bridges, food, and basically everything else. You don't "question" scientists when you drive a car, walk over a bridge, or store food in your refrigerator. You accept it unquestionably. You only "question" something when it is politically inconvenient for you (e.g. climate change).
>but you MUST believe themAs for your question. Yes, when it comes to science. Unless you want to argue that chemists don't understand what they are talking about, despite chemistry being a thing for several centuries now with real world results, or that there is a wide, century spanning, conspiracy by chemists to hide the trooof. The scale of human knowledge is too great of a magnitude for any one person to understand it all, so you must defer to others. I will happily defer to a chemist when it comes to chemistry as I am not chemist. As should you.
