>>12213508Attention is also when I am expecting to receive a response of some kind, it is more that attention is a guaranteed and that there are N-many audiences and a presenter.
My field does allow a person to understand anything that's being said, assuming the practitioner follows some basic guidelines and recognizes when their time is being wasted.
Linguistics, yes.
Also if generalizations obtained from a small slice were somehow wrong then technically any isolated conversation would be somehow wrong.
>>12213535The first impression is person-dependent and it does take some practice to be able to hold more than one first impression or the first impression of many or categorizing and grouping first impressions. It is something you can't really evaluate through a questionnaire but eye tracking does a fair enough initial approximate if you're curious in that direction.
>What is being optimized?Initially the presenter, then the remainder gets complex.
>but never mentioned why that process described somethingI was giving the description required at the time, happy to expand it. It just needed our conversation to 'go the distance' before I could show you analysis and application.
>I can ask plenty more questions tomorrow if youre patient with mePlease do.
>Mostly to help further prove my point that attention vs. attrition has begunThis was just me signaling to my own system to start measuring much attention and how much attrition is ultimately processed and added to the optimization pile after the conclusion of this thread.
>and all there is in existence is here and now.That was more a fancy way of saying that the space known as predicate can actually only hold a limited number of spaces in order for their to be a path because predicate has to stop being predicate (or a waste of time) for it to become postulate.
I would say though that language study should really only be, as with any field of study, if your hobbies or passions lay in that direction.
