>>12196855>IQ, as it is popularly defined as tested, was originally created to test for mental retardation for children with school difficulties.No, that was just one of the precursors to it.
>Because we are so attached to the way we do IQ now, it’s not a valid way to measure intelligence nor is it going to be in the foreseeable future.This doesn't mean anything. There's either several previous sentences missing that provide context, or it's incoherent rambling.
>There are many cognitive assessments much better than IQThere is literally no other cognitive assessment with more predicative power than IQ on a general basis, and even specific measures don't beat IQ by a sizeable degree.
>things have become so politicized that any real criticism and you’re met with aggressive tribalism.This, but for advocacy of IQ. The entirety of IQ denial is predicated on the idea that we can't present it as an explanation of why people can't differ in socio-economic outsomes for example, which is why you follow this up with
>>>>/pol/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvKN5KxPq4s 
