>>12195211Not that guy, but to be fair, no one is arguing for frequency. Humans are overall as infrequent of a species as it gets. That it exists in other species is enough to make the point that it is at least possible.
That being said, I think out of the box humans have potential wirings for either monogamy or polygamy. My guess is that humans likely have played both roles depending on shifting environment. I would think that it depends on environmental factors whether or not someone is wired for monogamy or polygamy.
