>>12186625midwit is not a specific iq, it is an amalgamation of iq and personality.
I'd say the midwit range is 105-125. If you are a midwit you are in this iq range (higher than this you would argue yourself out of this, less than this you dont give a crap).
Not everyone in this iq range is a midwit.
A midwit is someone who is clever enough to expose themselves to critical thinkers/ regurgitate their arguments/ but does not systematically analyse the claims. These are the people who argue small points with big ideas- eg start an argument about interest rates with pure unaltered Marxism/ Ancap/ Natsoc, ie make everything fit what you know bc you are clever enough to develop/ understand the framework...
People with IQ in this range but DONT do these things are not midwits- they dont give a crap about appearing educated. eg James Watsons IQ is 124, Cricks 115 they didn't give a damn about appearing 'socially smart' and helped find the double helix...
Same vice versa, lots of very clever people that act like midwits in academia.
