>>12181929oh? give even one good point from that link
>>12181913what's that bigger thing?
how can anything be bigger than literal quantum immortality?
>>12181910lol nice one, but there's still an issue:
any system measurement is necessarily a LOCAL fact since there's always something outside your measurement.
>>12181895there are two "ideas" presented here:
the first is that you can't prove you're immortal to anyone you see
the second is that, if QI is real, then you are still killing some version of you since you are hijacking that version of you's life when you're moved to a new timeline.
but please, enlighten us with your triple digit iq
>>12181884what if you're wrong though?