/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12178432

9KiB, 232x217, index.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 17:32:21 2020 No.12178432 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12178499 >>12178509 >>12178520 >>12178552 >>12178578 >>12179016 >>12181356 >>12181358

>NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T DIVIDE BY ZERO

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 17:37:18 No.12178449 Report

Quoted By: >>12178509 >>12178895

*pulls out casio ~VOID~ Edition*
Heh, watch th

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 17:50:06 No.12178499 Report

Quoted By: >>12178509 >>12180248

>>12178432
>x/0
why are mathlets so afraid of this?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 5436457.png, 8KiB, 401x378

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 17:53:24 No.12178509 Report

Quoted By: >>12178534

>>12178432
>>12178449
>>12178499
graph it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 17:56:29 No.12178520 Report

Quoted By:

>>12178432
what does it equal OP

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 18:00:02 No.12178534 Report

Quoted By:

>>12178509
stop necessitating a needless constraint.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 18:05:44 No.12178552 Report

Quoted By: >>12178576

>>12178432
x/0 = j
where j is the jmaginary number.

There, now it's defined.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 18:12:00 No.12178576 Report

Quoted By: >>12178596 >>12181045

>>12178552
0j = x, but j - j = 0 therefore (j - j)j = j2 - j2 = 0 = x, for every x, so x = 0. Just by trying to solve one problem you've deleted every non-null number, well done, anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 18:12:41 No.12178578 Report

Quoted By:

>>12178432
This is mathematics! I do whatever the hell I want! Just try and stop me!
$\frac{1}{0}$

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 18:17:17 No.12178596 Report

Quoted By: >>12178711

>>12178576
j^2 - j^2 would have to be 0^2, where
0^2 =/= 0^1

obviously they would be equivalent in the reals, but what about the complejx plane?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 18:46:56 No.12178711 Report

Quoted By: >>12179094

>>12178596
We're losing a lot of the standard properties of a ring now. Otherwise 0^2 = 0*0 = 0*0 + 0 = 0*0 + 0*1 = 0*(0+1) = 0*1 = 0;

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO apu-apustaja-dunce.png, 61KiB, 658x901

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 19:28:30 No.12178895 Report

Quoted By:

>>12178449
>th
Are you okay, Anon?

... Anon?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 20:05:00 No.12179012 Report

Quoted By: >>12180262

The creator of number zero did it. 0/0=0

Eurocucks couldn't accept that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 20:06:35 No.12179016 Report

Quoted By:

>>12178432
Anything divided by zero is undefined you can totally divide by zero.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 20:34:45 No.12179094 Report

Quoted By: >>12179136

>>12178711
>0*0 = 0*0 + 0
you can't just pull zeroes out of your ass anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 30 Sep 2020 20:49:16 No.12179136 Report

Quoted By: >>12180237

>>12179094
>what is the identity property
Granted it should be 0*0 = 0*(0+0) but you absolutely can pull zeroes out of your ass.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 02:18:45 No.12180237 Report

Quoted By: >>12180255

>>12179136
>the identity property
clearly that would only apply to zeroes of the same order

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 02:21:45 No.12180248 Report

Quoted By:

>>12178499
infinite 0s can fit into an x. Its not meaningless, just not something you can do algebra on.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 02:24:01 No.12180255 Report

Quoted By:

>>12180237
why?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 02:25:43 No.12180262 Report

Quoted By: >>12180978

>>12179012
Wouldnt 0/0=1?
Taking the limit of x/x as x approaches 0 would =1 from both the positive and negative side

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 05:54:06 No.12180978 Report

Quoted By: >>12180987

>>12180262
literally L'hospitals rule, innit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 05:56:42 No.12180987 Report

Quoted By:

>>12180978
L'Hôpital

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 06:23:43 No.12181045 Report

Quoted By: >>12181056

>>12178576
I could make the same type of complaint about imaginary numbers. Just as the imaginary numbers destroys the order structure, the jmaginary numbers must destroy some of the field structure.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 06:32:01 No.12181056 Report

Quoted By:

>>12181045
Go ahead and try you filthy faggot

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 15234789023.png, 254KiB, 785x1000

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 07:26:58 No.12181206 Report

Quoted By:

>NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T COUNT THE NUMBER OF CONTAINERS YOU WOULD NEED TO HOUSE SOME OBJECTS WHEN YOU PUT 0 OF THEM IN EACH CONTAINER

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 09:19:38 No.12181356 Report

Quoted By:

>>12178432
Nope, you can't. Because you would yield number that's bigger than upper limit or the imaginary line in real numbers, because it's getting just at the end of them, and drawing another line is good to do at maths where something doesn't work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 09:20:53 No.12181358 Report

Quoted By: >>12181361

>>12178432
1/INTEGER.
You simply have every number there, where 0 means converting to logical function instead of quantified logic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 09:22:21 No.12181361 Report

Quoted By:

>>12181358
1/float with edge of universe adjustments sounds better and never reach zero, but best it's limiting above 1, and having some sort of exponentiation and square rooting done on subject.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 09:52:57 No.12181391 Report

Quoted By: >>12181394

The Google calculator, try it.
Also see what inf^-1 gives

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20201001-125144_Samsu (...).jpg, 181KiB, 1079x1227

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 09:54:01 No.12181394 Report

Quoted By:

>>12181391
forgot pic

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 10:18:18 No.12181427 Report

Quoted By: >>12181446

engineer here
1/0 = infinity

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 10:28:52 No.12181446 Report

Quoted By:

>>12181427
Trust me, I'm an engineer

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 10:30:39 No.12181453 Report

Quoted By:

Whabout |1/0|? Wouldn't it be actually +inf?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Oct 2020 10:37:56 No.12181469 Report

Quoted By:

0
0 = n * 0, where n is literally anything
divide both sides by 0
0/0 = 1 = n = (n*0)/0
> 1 = n
cool fucking math OP

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches