>>12177464Why do retarded fedoras always, without fail, IMMEDIATELY respond with this non-sequitur?
The guy was obviously talking about programming for scientific computing. This means constructing models and then implementing them on data sets or what have you. Sure you can codemonkey the implementation part if someone does all the other work for you and hands you an instruction set that has almost no reference to the original scientific content. That is obviously not what is meant, especially in the context of university coursework.
Fucking CS monkeys can never grasp the fact that someone else had to do real work before they were given their room temp IQ task.
