>>12173076I said superdeterminism is a brainlet take due to the presence of Unobservables. Not just unobserved Wavefunctions, but Unobservable ones.
There exists three ‘states’ of superpositions, observed superpositions, which collapse instantly due to the immediate decoherence, unobserved superpositions, and unobservable superpositions.
Put a cat in a box with a randomly decaying cesium atom and a vial of poison that will break when said cesium atom decays, and don’t open it, then the cat is in a superposition of states as indicated by the Linear form of the Schrödinger equation; however, you could instantly open the box whenever you wanted and collapse the wavefunction if you made the ‘choice’ to observe or not.
Now, take the box, which you haven’t observed yet, and throw it into a black hole. That box is now Unobservable, you cannot get to it and observe it because you will get squashed by infinite time dilation the second you try to cross the event horizon (not Lorentz contraction, Time dilation; Einstein dissipated any confusion back in 1907, in papers few read, all of them not alive today.)
The box is Unobservable. You cannot get to it and observe the cat, meaning it has maximally undergone information entropy and cannot be retrieved due to pain of violation of the 2nd law of Thermodynamics and Information conservation.
What does this mean about superdeterminism? It means that there could be no determined states in this Unobservable, as that would violate causality and information conservation.
Here’s something to blow your mind: Observers only do one thing, they destroy isolated systems and introduce non-isolated systems, allowing entropy to be reversed for decoherence from maximum entanglement to occur. This means that if the cat were beyond a black hole, and could not be observed, it would have to be maximally entangled and isolated as to not have any observers allow it to become non-isolated, which violates superdeterminism.
