>>12168385>The holocaust has hundreds of thousands of eye-witnesses, confessions, documents, photographs, population data, crime scenes, mass graves. Most importantly, none of these disparate forms of evidence contradict each other in the slightest.It literally doesn't. All of that is forgeable "evidence" by two superpowers and you do not have to go through great lengths to claim that it's a conspiracy. The completely undeniable evidence can only exist under the form of a predictive whistleblowing which is then confirmed by investigation, and there was none. Like for an example the conspiracies of the NSA. In a event of this size, which you claim was a tightly-operated conspiracy with millions of participants and victims, there wasn't a single villager, empathetic officer or cover anti-fascist to blow the whistle on it. Nothing. Only until they were occupied did the evidence "appear".
Now on the other hand, my conspiracy claim requires just a hundred or so military staff of fully mobilized superpowers in a world war, with all the secrecy that their posts require, and no side witnesses, civilians or other participants at all. The second order of participants in this conspiracy is mainly jews who'd gladly do it out of spite, spite that can be empirically displayed even to this day (pic related).
Which of the above conspiracies is more likely, scientifically speaking by applying the razor, and yes, your claim is a conspiracy theory as well, that the nazis kept it completely hidden with a suppressive power that doesn't exist even today, until the very end. But seeing how you reverted to emotional adhom I doubt that you are capable of actually answering without doubling down on your emotions. Not surprised either as the whole holocaust claim is literally built on: 1) emotions, 2) ego agitprop to people who never experienced it and were told that their ancestors got slaughtered.
