>>12166997>multiple cars for every personThis only became necessary once sex was liberalized, because now people's ability to reproduce is tied to status which is closely tied with conspicuous consumption.
Like everything that leads to overconsumption, causual sex was originally shilled by leftists, ironically as a "low consumption" form of recreation based on the childish logic of:
>It only requires people's bodies>Therefore no consumption lmaowhich completely ignores the competitive psychology behind sex, and the fact that sex is basically the root of competition and status accumulation in every other animal species.
"Social conservatism" is just what people in the west have been conditioned to call "minimizing consumption". These practices evolved independent of geography (a major hint that the environment they are an adaptation to is humanity itself) in times of scarcity precisely because they regulated the dominant modes of consumption (sex, violence, anything else with an "arms race" dynamic). Everything about the social side of leftism is geared towards maximizing consumption.
Deconstructing families and inheritance => deconstructing sharing and recycling.
Deconstructing sexual taboos => mainstreaming consumption based sexual competition.
Deconstructing borders => ties 3rd world fertility to 1st world per capita consumption, negating the low population + high quality of life strategy.
Redistribution => taking from non consumers and giving to consumers.
Etc, etc.
Unlimited productive power + regulating demand is always superior to limiting productive power + deregulating demand.
Truncating humanity's potential just so dudebros and whores don't need to self-regulate, instead of just cracking down on destructive hedonism, is prioritizing hedonism over meaningful progress.
