>>12163459>I have no estimates because there is no data. It doesn't matter anyway for this discussion.No, anon, it pretty much relevant. You claim that corona causes a lot of trouble with very high probability. If Sweden is full of corona, then where is the trouble? If it isn't, why?
>Erm, I don't think you get the implications of those revelations.Again, it's bad and if you want to fight it, please do. But it would be very strange to complain about stage 1 cancer and then being all-ok about stage 4 cancer.
>That's not what's happening though. That's what happening. Lockdowns, house arrests, transport bans, closing of businesses, ban of entertainment, people losing jobs, tracing apps, future forced vaccines, immunity passports, travel ban, forced masks and so on - all this stuff is either implemented or is promised to be implemented. By the way, Swedish neighbours some people praise hardly wear any masks too. Unlike some countries doing worse than Swedes.
>Good question. Have you tried looking it up? Perhaps, if you don't test, then covid-19 deaths aren't recognized as such because nobody tests for it? Hmm.Or every possible death is written as corona. We can use the fake data argument both ways.
>I think you forgot what we were talking about and since Sweden is your only argument among 150 or so nations concentrate on that single unreliable data point. I think your point is that you have none.There is an example of Belarus. Of course if you claim that Sweden fakes its data, you will claim the same about Belarus. But, as you can notice, Belarus had war parades and is currently having huge protests. If corona is indeed bad, then the protesters will start to drop like flies from it. Do they claim that?
You are also free to provide examples of other anti-covid-measures countries.
