>>12159068>Rose>Verified twit>Looks like a non passing tranny>"Powerful", "Stunning an Brave", etc Buzzfeed-tier platitudes completely lacking in substanceWhat is it that they actually want?
Overconsumption and poverty cannot simultaneously be an issue.
Which is it?
If over-consumption is the issue, you solve it by making lowering people's ability to consume => making them poorer.
If poverty is the problem, you solve it by making people richer => making them more able to consume.
Anyone who simultaneously claims that capitalism*** is failing because of simultaneous poverty and over-consumption immediately loses the argument.
>But poor people are in poverty, and rich people are doing all the consumingExcept they aren't. Rich people get and stay rich by investing, not consuming. Currently, the most profitable investments are in dumb consumer trash for dumb consumers, precisely because dumb consumers have so much purchasing power. The consumers are the ones making the rich people rich, if they were too poor, it would be so profitable to market dumb consumer shit towards them.
The problem is and will always be low IQ high time preference types such as dudebros, whores, niggers, junkies, etc.
If these are the people you have to work with, it literally doesn't matter what "the system" is, just like how changing "the system" that chimps live under isn't going to suddenly make them industrialize.
If people lack the self control to not spend money on dumb shit in a market, then they lack the self control to not vote for dumb shit if it's allocated democratically.
***This is literally a meme term in and of itself.
If regulatory nationalist monarchies and free market globalist democracies are both "capitalism", then "capitalism" is a meaningless term, and thinking in terms of "capitalism" and "anti capitalism" is basically the economic equivalent of
>Everything is a thing doing stuff>This describes everything>Therefore it's a theory of everything>QED 
