>>12152217Nah it was just Ron Gordon and the other powerusers getting mad that someone beat them to the punch and solved it way faster than they could. They post all this shit all the time like "probably doesn't even have a closed form, vote to close" until Cleo posted the answer, then they go away for a few days or a week and then prove it right, all while bitching about someone's free answer not being up to their standards.
By the way,
>My real name is Cleo, I'm female. I have a medical condition that makes it very difficult for me to engage in conversations, or post long answers, sorry for that. I like math and do my best to be useful at this site, although I realize my answers might be not useful for everyoneCleo only put that up because the first response she gave in the comments was "the answer was revealed by Namagiri" or something and then she enraged all the fag powerusers with the explanation (paraphrasing):
"The proof would depend on your set of axioms. Knowing that the answer is true, as I do, I prefer to work in a set of axioms where this result is true. Therefore, this post is the full proof."
Then SE raged and reported her, and then she changed her profile to the medical condition bullshit.
