>>12148114All life forms are somewhat similar.
There are major differences between the two and you presuppose that both are primitive and therefore on a timeline projection an earlier stage of civilization and therefore more observable in the expression of their behaiviour. But you dont adress behaiviour you adress a difference in expressiveness of social or technological norms. Hutlive and Iglulife are vastly different.
Every foundational science or highly theoretical one that would adress such divergences in behaviour or culture would still find between all three supposed parties involved such a major role of highly specialised knowledge and ritual that any recursion to genetics or nominal differences outside of the socially cohesive groups could not turn into a valid organized nominalistic classification. Similarily to why dictionary science would be recursive to the word dictionary.
You could stimulate your pea-brain just as much learning classificational tables of bush medicine as you could with pharmacy. Maybe even more who knows. And even if you couldnt you wouldnt notice. I doubt that anyone who leads a fulfilled intellectual life would engage in race theory.
