>>12136170You are supposed to do the entire thing, start from the normal state and work your way up to even further beyond.
E.g. in the context of this meme
>You're going to love this, trust me>What you're seeing now is my normal state (or function).And at this point you post either a cubic function, gokus face or gokus face with a cubic function photoshopped over it.
>This is a derivativeAt which point you post a 2nd degree function version of the previous
>And this... this is what is known as a derivative that has ascended above a derivative. Or you could just call this a second derivativeWith an image version with 1st degree function
>AND THIS...>IS TO DERIVE EVEN FURTHER BEYONDWhich you then finish with a constant
You can also do an integral version or a simplified version like this
>>12135574And versions where you add side banter from pythagoras and newton and shit e.g.
>has he really found a way to surpass the ascended derivative? is that possible?>he must be bluffing I am what would that make him? a double ascended?Panel of AAAAAAAAA is never bad either
