>>12132759What are you trying to say dumb spastic? Do you unironically think a smart man not doing something means that retards are able to do it?
>>12132762>Not really. Our economic system favors bad people above everything else at every scale.Wrong
> You have gamer girl bathwater proving that as long as you have the combo of traits pretty and shameless/immoral/dumb you can get rich. Yeah, you "can". If you looked at the economics of camwhoring/streaming you'd notice that wealth inequality exists there too. 1% generates 90% of the revenue or so, off the top of my head.
>Then you have business where if you’re willing to lie cheat and steal you will be much better off than someone who acts with integrity.Sure, but you're assuming both have the same level of intelligence which wasn't the original claim.
>>12132766>Intelligence is a non-factor, and mine is much higher than yours.Good to know
>There are very few jobs and almost 0 educational paths that require intelligence. And this is pure bull. Every educational path requires intelligence thanks to competition. Sure, you can make the argument that a retard can become a career soldier (untrue) but the fact is that competition will always weed the weak through SAT and entrance exams.
>Success is mostly about being as sleazy as possible without getting caught.Yet majority of American psychos are serving jail time, how come they're not successful if getting a good job requires no intelligence?
