>>12116476>Well there it is again. Pure ignorance and idiocy. 1 testimony may mean little even when it´s a expert testimony but what has piled up over this case alone should at least make anyone wonder.We don't do science based on testimony.
Also, your precious testimony is contradicted by the people involved. David Fravor has claimed multiple times that the guys from the nimitz encounter documentary are making shit up. So your witnesses can't even keep their story straight.
>But not you. You need the classified radar data (which you would dismiss also because you are stupidOr maybe it shows absolutely nothing out of the ordinary. Just like the videos don't.
>You will always demand the data that is not avaliable to make your caseNope. I'm asking for you to uphold a basic standard and you cannot provide it because your evidence sucks ass and has been debunked. You have no counter arguments, no science or math to support your view.
It's all pure cope "BUT DA WITNESS TESTIMONY!!!".
