>>12113261>all these nations just exploded 10-fold with their cases so the IFR can still be 2% dude >>12113250Netherlands is at best twice as high than the cases 2-4 weeks ago. So at best you can up the CFR from 0.168% to 0.336%.
Germany is flat for 1 month now so the 0.277% should not be any different.
Switzerland is only slightly rising only being 35% higher than 2 weeks ago so accounting for that you get 0.344%
Kuwaiti cases are about 15% higher than 2 weeks ago so accounting for that you get 0.394%
I could add Sweden too but I omitted it due to low sample size.
When not looking at the last week but the whole period we can also note that the total CFR of of Singapore 0.047% (seems like an outlier), Qatar is just 0.169%, of the Maldives only 0.345%, of Bahrain 0.357% and of Israel 0.422%
So there you go, four adjusted CFR cases below 0.4%
This is why I claimed 0.3% and not 0.17%
>>12113290>>12113257Yeah this shit annoys me. We all know that when the first wave happened almost none of the countries carried out large scale testing to the point that they caught anything near 10% of all cases let alone 100%.
It's as if your dataset starts out with wrong datapoints but you refuse to omit it just because it's a datapoint.
If you measure something and the first datapoint is 200 and all the subsequent ones are 1 and then you just claim after the 5th datapoint
>derp, the average is 40.8and after the 10th
>derp, the average is 20.9and after the 20th
>derp, the average is 10.95, o golly I sure am wondering where this is going to converge to, derp 
