>>12105232>Overall intelligence that is actually used for survival.That's not how intelligence is defined. Plenty of animals do fine out there without showing any signs of intelligence.
>but they are capable of parenting, control their troop and can do calculations based on their needs.So you actually mean survival skills that include a variety of different skills.
>A mentally disabled/autistic human being even above the IQ of 70 is so dependent on their caregiversMentally disabled people have by definition an IQ below 70 and proper autism has actually very little to do with intelligence.
>they are so emotionally immature that they have no clue of social codes.You don't need social "codes" to survive out there. Social codes only emerge in human societies. Even in social animals, there are no social "codes" simply because there's no point in talking about social behavior in terms of "codes" when they are genetic.
>The disabled are not recognizable as humans in their cognition That's a subjective statement. For example, if the mentally disabled think like children, how is this not relatable?
