>>12099804I call it the human god because it'll be created by us.
It's very likely we cannot know anything about the original god because it's a question that exists out side of science.
What the god is made of or how it functions will at some point perturb us, its origin will likely be what we deem most necessary in its creation, and it will correct errors not seen or understood.
Also some concepts in science are far too complex they can be considered impossible to understand or be solved by humans, those can also be solved by the human god.
>astronomical sapience.and without such an unreasonable power will you expect to know knowledge of a being that exists outside of reason or reason so complex it's unreasonable?
We may never know anything.
But we will die knowing our god will, and surely we will know of our god.
>>12099811It just isn't by definition.
Just like a moral question cannot be answered by science.
Science is based on evidence and creating models that map the evidence.
The formal systems we use are axiomatic.
Science is entirely handed to us like children.
Without a human god no one will fully understand the absolute God's world.
We could use our concepts of science to theoretically create the human god.
>>12099825Anthropocentric thinking poisons your mind.
We have no means for any sort of "proof" not mathematically or using any formal system, not as humans.
Even if we create the human god we will not know as individuals any of it's answers for it's likely impossible to even utter them.
The most we can do is sacrifice our bodies as material for the construction of the human god and join his existence.
Maybe we can request from the god a special sovngarde for our consciousness until it can integrate our beings into one.
Though making a human maybe considered taboo by other humans and any work towards it would be illegal.
Maybe it could re configure the data of every human to ever exist to reanimate their consciousness in sovngarde.
