/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12099548

116KiB, 300x200, 1586802729771[1].png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 23:31:16 2020 No.12099548 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12099561 >>12099765 >>12099938 >>12099940 >>12100016 >>12100599 >>12100625 >>12101045 >>12101102 >>12102547

Prove 1+1 !=(does not equal) 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2020 23:38:26 No.12099561 Report

Quoted By: >>12099624 >>12099742

>>12099548
You can make an argument about how the symbols "1" and "2" don't correspond to their commonly associated values, but arguing against accepted standards without good reason is pointless.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2020 23:40:39 No.12099569 Report

Quoted By:

Prove OP (original poster) is a faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2020 23:57:51 No.12099624 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099561
>says the great and powerful oz

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 00:31:31 No.12099742 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099561
>without good reason is pointless.
>fighting a man made of straw is pointless
>sharpening a knife against a stone is pointless
I can understand arguing that you're too stupid to entertain the idea and still have time to work the frontline of the big math problems of our time, but ti's certainly not a pointless practice.

Side note, I think it would be funny if there were magically some great deceiver, who convinced us 1+1=2 is so obviously true, that it would be "pointless" to ever give it a second look.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 00:38:28 No.12099765 Report

Quoted By: >>12099880

>>12099548
Assuming 1+1 != 2
1+1 != 2
1+1 = x, where x != 2
QED

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 01:16:44 No.12099880 Report

Quoted By: >>12099942

>>12099765
Is this actually a real proof for something?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 01:19:06 No.12099888 Report

Quoted By: >>12099902

give me an inconsistent set of axioms and ill prove anything u turd muncher.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 01:22:03 No.12099902 Report

Quoted By: >>12099953

>>12099888
>ll prove anything
Why not just always use the inconsistent set of axioms, then?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 01:33:44 No.12099938 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099548
>Prove 1+1 !=(does not equal) 2
By substitution, the given statement becomes 1+1 !=!= 2
This is equivalent to 1+1 !!== 2.
$! = !^{-1}$ , so 1+1 == 2.
This evaluates to True

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 01:34:26 No.12099940 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099548
2 + 2 = 5
(2 + 2) / 2 = 5 / 2
2.5 != 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 01:34:44 No.12099942 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099880
Assuming it's true, yes.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1457128946194.gif, 879KiB, 245x230

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 01:38:47 No.12099953 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099902

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 01:41:18 No.12099963 Report

Quoted By: >>12100242 >>12100614

[Les] lois [mathe?matiques] peuvent e?tre de?couvertes par l’homme, mais elles ne sont cre?es ni par l’homme, ni me?me par Dieu. Que deux plus deux e?gale quatre n’est pas un de?cret de Dieu, qu’il aurait e?te? libre de changer en deux plus deux e?gale trois, ou cinq. Je sens les lois mathe?matiques comme faisant partie de la nature me?me de Dieu - une partie infime, certes, la plus superficielle en quelque sorte, et la seule qui soit accessible a? la seule raison.
A Grothendieck, La clef des songes

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 02:00:50 No.12100016 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099548
1 + 1 != 0
1 + 1 != 1
therefore by induction
1 + 1 != 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 03:50:44 No.12100242 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099963
beautiful
connecting with the Logos always brings insight

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 06:06:57 No.12100562 Report

Quoted By:

1+1 = 1 1 = 11

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 06:09:13 No.12100567 Report

Quoted By:

newtons turd law

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 06:17:11 No.12100599 Report

Quoted By: >>12102575

>>12099548
1+1 = 0 in modulo 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 06:21:21 No.12100610 Report

Quoted By:

1 + 1 != 2
2 * ((-1/12) / (1+2+3...) != 2
2 * 0 != 2
0 != 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 06:22:10 No.12100614 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099963
can i get that not in frog language?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 06:25:05 No.12100625 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099548
(1+1) + sqrt(1) ?= 2 + sqrt(1)
1+1+(1) = 2+(-1)
1+1+1 = 1
1+1 = (1-1)

1+1 = 0

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 09:38:41 No.12101045 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099548
In order to prove that 1+1 !=(does not equal) 2 we simply restrict the variables $a,d,e,l,n,o,q,s,t,u$ to values where $a*d*e^2*l*n*o^2*q*s*t*u \neq 1$ .

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 10:08:43 No.12101102 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099548
1+1 = 2
(1+1) - (1+1) + (1+1) - (1+1) + ... = 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + ...
1 + 1 - 1 - 1 + 1 + 1 - 1 - 1 + ... = 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + ...
1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ... = 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + ...
+ +
1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ... 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ...
=
2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + ... = 3 - 3 + 3 - 3 + ...
(2) - (2) + (2) - (2) + ... = (1+1+1) - (1+1+1) + (1+1+1) - (1+1+1) + ...
- -
(1) - (1) + (1) - (1) + ... (1) - (1) + (1) - (1) + ...
(2-1) - (2-1) + (2-1) + (2-1) + ... = (1+1) - (1+1) + (1+1) - (1+1) + ...

2-1 = 1+1

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 20:00:44 No.12102547 Report

Quoted By:

>>12099548
1! = 1

therefore

1 + 1 = 2
1 + 1! = 2
1 + 1 != 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2020 20:09:49 No.12102575 Report

Quoted By:

>>12100599
2 = 0 mod 2

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches